Blowing stuff up!

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by bikerwriter, Feb 21, 2008.

  1. bikerwriter
    Offline

    bikerwriter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Location:
    St. Louis Park
    The Pentagon posted footage of the Aegis Cruiser Lake Erie shooting down our dying spy satellite. It's really cool. They need to hire that cameraman for sporting events... :biggrin:

    http://www.breitbart.tv/html/50894.html
     
  2. Soupboy
    Offline

    Soupboy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,318
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    St. Louis Park, MN
    I love the terminology. First time I've heard "intercept" used to describe blowing something up with a missile.

    I wish Tom Brady was intercepted.
     
  3. Bullwinkle
    Offline

    Bullwinkle Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,580
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Location:
    Saint Paul
    Man, I'd like to see just a snapshot of the physics/engineering calculations to make a "shot" like that. Good stuff!
     
  4. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Messages:
    12,344
    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Location:
    Eloh, El
    I don't think there were any calculations involved. If the guidance is like that of teh CIWS, then it is more of an error correction that takes into account the missile's current position in relation to the assigned target. The guidance controls make corrections to trajectory, and then another sample of relative position to the target is taken, and then corrections are made based off that info. This happens thousands of times per second until the missile makes contact with the target. If it is beam guided, then they likely phase the SPY1b to aim a beam at the target and the missile makes it's corrections based on how far off the beam it is.
     
  5. carl
    Offline

    carl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    we gotta gooooo
    well all the error corrections are done via calculations ;)
     
  6. EtchyLives
    Offline

    EtchyLives Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    MNSubaru B-Series Member# 8=====D
    I'm sure you know what I'm about to say but...

    He means that there were no ground-based calculations to figure out the trajectory of the satellite, the rotation of the earth, the location, speed and heading of the launch platform, the acceleration of the missile, the atmospheric conditions at all levels of the missile flight, yadda yadda yadda... moon landing stuff.

    All they had to figure out was roughly where the satellite was and point the missile in that direction. The Missile's guidance package took care of the rest.

    But you knew that. :)
     
  7. carl
    Offline

    carl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,981
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    we gotta gooooo
    of course i did. just a sarcastic remark in jest of the original flippant statement
     
  8. Bullwinkle
    Offline

    Bullwinkle Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,580
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Location:
    Saint Paul
    I guess that was my original point. Lotsa complicated stuff going on in the background for the missile guidance system to function correctly.
     
  9. Newb
    Offline

    Newb New Member

    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe I'm a giant nerd, but I think it's incredibly cool.

    To time a missile to hit a orbiting satellite's fuel tank perfectly is pretty cool imo.

    But if it's like you say, and it's pretty much just pressing a button, it's not as cool anymore. :(
     
  10. HoLsTeR
    Offline

    HoLsTeR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,328
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    223
    wasnt it moving over 2000mph too?
     
  11. pksublime
    Offline

    pksublime Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,186
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Champlin, Minnesota, United States
    that's pretty cool, and the hydrazine cloud burning off must have been spectacular
     
  12. bhiku
    Offline

    bhiku Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    201
    Location:
    Aversa, Italy (formerly BRF, WI)
    We got everything right to take down the satellite. Too bad we had a failure in keeping it up there, eh? Oh well, at least we were able to "fix" it. I suppose it was more a technical problem than a calculation, though.
     
  13. Chin
    Offline

    Chin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Savage
    The combined speed at impact was ~22000mph!