all the talk about the chubachabbra thing, and now, they found bigfoot? i found this website on CNN, I guess there will be a press conference this week. http://www.searchingforbigfoot.com/ :eek3:
lol he actually just curled up behind my shoulder while I was looking at it. He looks scared to me. I don't think he will be able to sleep.
http://www.popupexplorer.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=58047 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,363457,00.html
Only three photos from a company that hunts bigfoot. Suure. I suspect if they'd actually found one there'd be 1000 videos of it dead, hundreds of photos, and a lot more chaos from the scientific community. To quote Richard Hammond, "If you've got [bigfoot], why not shout about it?!" That said...please be real
LOL that site looks like a 4-year old put it together. Plus, that looks like a costume stuffed into a cooler. ROFLCOPTER! :laugh: -Steve
Plus, what is this infamous "DNA EVIDENCE" they are spouting about? (oooo....ahhhh....) What specifically in a DNA sequence makes you bigfoot? Wouldn't they have already had to have caught one and analyzed it to make it evidence?????? I bet the people who made the site don't even know one nitrogenous base that is found in DNA...... I'm laughing so hard right now it's not even funny! -Steve
I'm curious to see what DNA evidence they have as well. Human vs. Chimp/Gorilla/Organutan (Great Apes) Karyotipically are rather different. Many of the genes are the same (97-99%) but they'll show up differently on a Karyotype. For instance, the great apes have "2" Chromosome 2's - p and q arms are separate. Otherwise the banding patterns on a q-stain look very different to me. But what do I know, I've only been in Cytogenetics for almost 6 years. It's all in good fun, even if its fake!
Ah ok I suppose if they were going to make a claim that it was closer in relation to a chimp than a human (or some kind of 'in between') then I could see where DNA would maybe come into play. I was thinking along the lines of them already having "Bigfoot DNA" to show that it was the same. At any rate, that looks super fake. -Steve