Stock EJ22T Longblock, 373.3whp 408.1lb/ft. 28.3 psi.

Discussion in 'General Subaru Discussion' started by piddster, Mar 5, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. piddster
    Offline

    piddster Lone Wolf

    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    123
    piddster, Mar 5, 2007
    #1
  2. Sogonerg
    Offline

    Sogonerg Anteater

    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    wow...that's impressive
     
    Sogonerg, Mar 5, 2007
    #2
  3. piddster
    Offline

    piddster Lone Wolf

    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Its serious motivation to get my kinks worked out and get on a dyno. I'll be running pump gas though.
     
    piddster, Mar 5, 2007
    #3
  4. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    This makes me smile.
     
    readymix, Mar 5, 2007
    #4
  5. AWDimprezaL
    Offline

    AWDimprezaL has more posts than you

    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Trophy Points:
    573
    zomg this makes me smile as well, considering i'll be running a stock ej22t long block w00t w00t
     
    AWDimprezaL, Mar 5, 2007
    #5
  6. Dream
    Offline

    Dream Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    283
    Nice TQ, lots of boost though.
     
    Dream, Mar 5, 2007
    #6
  7. Threshld1
    Offline

    Threshld1 Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    233
    mmmmm, must find management for larger injectors and maxed MAF....:(
     
    Threshld1, Mar 5, 2007
    #7
  8. Deride
    Offline

    Deride Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    248
    I think you might end up a bit higher than you thought, if he's running stock heads/cams.... Dan get that car on the dyno ASAP!
     
    Deride, Mar 5, 2007
    #8
  9. Dynapar
    Offline

    Dynapar Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    358
    wow thats alot of TQ! althugh it was on a dynopack (how does these comapre to the mustang/dynodynamics?)
     
    Dynapar, Mar 5, 2007
    #9
  10. Ej22TIM
    Offline

    Ej22TIM Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    133
    i need to get my shizz intercooled!
     
    Ej22TIM, Mar 5, 2007
    #10
  11. DB Performance
    Offline

    DB Performance New Member

    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dynapack numbers are much much higher than Mustang and Dynodynamics numbers. Take Dynojet numbers and then pull the wheels off the car and bolt the hubs directly to the dyno for even less loss.
     
    DB Performance, Mar 6, 2007
    #11
  12. bikerwriter
    Offline

    bikerwriter Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Dynapaks are weird. I could never figure out why they went with hub adapters.

    Sure, you eliminate frictional losses of tires/road, but the measurement still has drivetrain losses. While it might get you closer to an actual engine dyno in terms of power output, it isn't that much closer, and now you don't know how much power you are actually putting down on the road. Add in the time of taking the wheels off, setting up the adapters, etc., and I don't know why they bother...
     
    bikerwriter, Mar 8, 2007
    #12
  13. piddster
    Offline

    piddster Lone Wolf

    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Either way, that's pretty damn good for a bone stock motor with heads that do not flow that well, hence so much boost.


    Let's not split hairs:roll:
     
    piddster, Mar 8, 2007
    #13
  14. WRX1
    Offline

    WRX1 _ Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    727
    Trophy Points:
    348
    Well, the dynapak eliminates alot of dangers. As long as the hubs are on correctly, you don't have the rolling tires or anything. They are also ALOT quieter. If you have been to a bunch of dyno days, you will see that there are certain tires that make some really bad noises on the dyno rollers.

    Russ
     
    WRX1, Mar 8, 2007
    #14
  15. FuJi K
    Offline

    FuJi K Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    248
    I should put the perrin 35R on my EJ22T...ahhahah modded STi injectors on 1.8L fuel rails.....Power FC? hehe!!
     
    FuJi K, Mar 8, 2007
    #15
  16. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Sorry to steal your thunder Fuji, but I'm buying my cams today ;) And whenever Ray gets word from Andrewtech, the PPG gears will be ordered...
    I'm hoping to have the car on the road by early April.
     
    readymix, Mar 8, 2007
    #16
  17. piddster
    Offline

    piddster Lone Wolf

    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Sweet. Get that thing rollin.


    I'm curious how I'll do with the 30R and those Delta cams. I'm holding off on the dyno untill I get a AFPR. The diaphram in my wastegate actuator blew out, so I have zero boost control right now. I might hold out for an EWG.

    Then its on like donkey kong.
     
    piddster, Mar 8, 2007
    #17
  18. FuJi K
    Offline

    FuJi K Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    248
    oi!
    I just recieved word that my wires will be merged next week.....muahahaha
    I got my QUICK STEERING COLUMN in....2 turns lock to lock..muahahaha
    but will be scary on the hiway....ahhhHHHH
    maybe my car will be up by then too......9months baby...lolz
     
    FuJi K, Mar 8, 2007
    #18
  19. DB Performance
    Offline

    DB Performance New Member

    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Dynapacks are a lot quieter. There have been incidents of the hub adapters snapping off though.
     
    DB Performance, Mar 8, 2007
    #19
  20. TSTRBOY2004
    Offline

    TSTRBOY2004 Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    393
    well you wouldnt have to strap it down!!! which takes a lot of time...

    so I dont see the big deal... at least it would be way more accurate...
     
    TSTRBOY2004, Mar 8, 2007
    #20
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.