making smoke that pollutes the OZONE... ha ha ha ha ha not to mention defeats the purpose of owning one... ha ha
First of all i did not say that i would get smart for a sole purpose of saving the planet. I would get it because it looks cool. And bigger turbo does not mean more emission.
thank God cause the planet would definitely be DOOMED!!! Oh by smart you meant the car NOT your brains... I guess I need the latter to understand your dribble... ha ha ha mate you just need to stop posting or stop thinking!!! OR BOTH!!!! wow you do come up with some pretty funny stuff, not to mention everytime you post you either react back or you contradict your previous posts.... Now if you are purposefully doing this to be funny then you are an over-achiever... ha ha if you are serious with your postings.. then I dont want to call you names and be nasty (cause I am having fun)... but wow just wow.... you need to get out more, stay away from the internets.. actually I vote you go play on Nasioc with your thoughts for a day... see whether you still think we are nasty on this site... ha ha ha
whoa, this is better than oprah:munching: So much drama, soo much drama If he's a mod this is some pretty good black ops back to topic....I'd drive one, but no way would I ever put that on 494 during rush hour
Yeah, i dont think i would want to go driving it on 35E where the limit is 70 too. But i go there with my 250cc bike and its not too bad.
there is this one guy i know that commutes 160 miles a day. he is hell bent on getting a smart. he'll prolly get buried in snow the 1st winter LOL apparently the mpg of his suzuki ...er chevy aveo isnt good enough he says. but i agree...smart cars arent much use except maybe for bigger cities like NY and Chicago. + 11ty billion for wanting better public transportation in T.C. Either give us a subway (not the sandwich) or expand the freeways. 494/94/77/36/5/694...each are freakin parking lots. Met council sucks cock