t3hw00t Project Impreza MR RWD thread...

Discussion in 'Modifications And Maintenance' started by readymix, Mar 23, 2008.

  1. curly2k3
    Offline

    curly2k3 Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    1,140
    Trophy Points:
    473
    i would just put the engine and tranny where they need to drop in, you can shift other things around pretty easily to move the weight bias
     
  2. TSTRBOY2004
    Offline

    TSTRBOY2004 Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    403
    Trophy Points:
    393
    or make this a setup for weight in the front!!!

     
  3. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    This is another good point. While we do have some leway with where the engine and tranny mount in the back, we don't have much. Obviously shifting the weight forward a couple inches would have noticable effects in terms of weight balance since the engine and tranny make up a very large portion of the car's total weight. But as piddster said, keep everything close to center. I think those two thoughts are, at the very least, where we will start. Get it as close to center as possible and go for it...then adjust other areas of the car accordingly.

    But I also agree with wotboy that pre-calculations might make the decision of a few inches in terms of mounting. Obviously, a radiator and a battery aren't going to make a lot of difference, but they make some. I think getting the balance with motor and tranny to within 10%+/- of 50/50 would be good and we can go from there on where to mount things.
     
  4. curly2k3
    Offline

    curly2k3 Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    1,140
    Trophy Points:
    473
    well the "50/50" that is commonly mentioned is overall, it would be more accurate to have a +/- based from the center of the car, but thats not how they do it.


    with that said, i think if you get the powertrain put in where it needs to be (and yeah, as far forward as possible) i think you would have your best starting point. if you have a rear bias at that point, you can move the parts towards the front and center of the car as needed to balance it out.

    i think the most interesting part will be getting the suspension correct, i would advise to start reading up on the MR2OC or similar sites that focus on cars that are MR or RR set up. Porsche, MR2s, ect... are going to be the starting point to get strut, spring, and sway rates down initially for a baseline suspension set up. you can adjust those from the baseline and you can effectively overcome any weight bias front to back really IMO.
     
  5. cp9a6m
    Offline

    cp9a6m New Member

    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sweet idea man!

    There's a guy on Honda-Tech who did something very similar to what you are talking about. He did a lot of very interesting things to make it all come together, and it's probably the most meticulous builds of this type I've ever seen. Link here. You might get some good ideas from this dude, he really knows what he's doing.
     
  6. piddster
    Offline

    piddster Lone Wolf

    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    123
    I say just put the motor and trans where they fit best, and where it works with the design of your cage. Once you have that all set, you can play with a few things. In all reality, what is left that has a decent amount of mass? Battery and fuel cell?

    I don't think (its a hunch) that your weight bias will be that bad. There will still be a fair amount of weight on the front wheels. The driver and passenger(?) will still be in front of the vehicle centerline.
     
  7. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Agreed. Figure two people, the seats and dash, radiator, and a fuel cell (we discussed 15 gallon) and possibly the battery, but that may end up in the rear of the car since wiring will be easier that way. Isn't gas like 8lbs per gallon? If so, a half tank of gas would be about 60lbs.
     
  8. piddster
    Offline

    piddster Lone Wolf

    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    123
    I always figured about 7 lb/gal, but thats splitting hairs.
     
  9. Chux
    Offline

    Chux Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    1,507
    Trophy Points:
    398
    even if the engine and tranny isn't hanging out over the rear axle, they won't be in the front anymore. so your CG is going to drastically shift toward the rear.


    There's a guy down in georgia that was hardcore into AutoX with his RX and actually calculated weight distribution. it was an EA82 car, but I think they're pretty similar. lighter motor, but the gas tank is further back. IIRC (I'll try to find the thread) it was almost exactly 60/40 to the front.


    I bet you'll pretty much flip that. especially with the added weight of the cage back there.


    I'd look at putting the fuel cell in the engine compartment....kinda scary concept, but I think it would work.




    also, thinking about putting any sort of firewall between the engine and front seats? might get kinda noisy/fumey without some sort of barrier, not to mention that whole safety thing.....you'll already be making some ductwork for the radiator and intercooler (I'm assuming one on each side....). then you could also improve airflow around the motor so it doesn't make the cabin sweltering hot in the summer.




    I can't tell you how excited I am by this project. I've wanted to do something like this for years. It's a Lotus Exige....but sexy :cool:

    If you ever think of selling it. PLEASE let me know. I don't know if I'll ever have the space or equipment to build something like this anytime in the near future.....
     
  10. w_o_t_boy
    Offline

    w_o_t_boy Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Dihydrogen Oxide is about 8lbs/gal. According to my boat owner's manual gas is more like 6.5.
     
  11. w_o_t_boy
    Offline

    w_o_t_boy Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Weight distribution should also have an effect on your choice of tire width. It you get the weight close to 50/50 and put giant rear wheels on, the thing's just going to understeer all over the place. That's how they get 911's to handle right with all that ass weight. The rear tires are like twice as wide as the front.
     
  12. subytek
    Offline

    subytek Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Off a 99' L wagon AWD 2.2l 5sp, 56% of the weight is on the front wheels. Per the Subaru service manual.
     
  13. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    I guess the FWD version would be more front biased since the rear diff is missing as well as the driveshaft?
     
  14. subytek
    Offline

    subytek Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    101
    You would be correct, but I can't go back far enough to tell you what it is.
     
  15. w_o_t_boy
    Offline

    w_o_t_boy Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Wiring a 32-bit ECU to regular 2.0l heads would make it a bit tricker. I'm sure its doable, though. What's the horsepower goal/turbo size for this thing? Can we get away with using a stock ECU? LGT's have that new airbox with the bigger MAF housing.
     
  16. w_o_t_boy
    Offline

    w_o_t_boy Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    223
    I looked for these trannys on junkyard sites the other day. They were like $1000-$1200 depending on miles.
     
  17. w_o_t_boy
    Offline

    w_o_t_boy Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Will any work be done on this bad idea this weekend?
     
  18. Paul Revere
    Offline

    Paul Revere BANNED

    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know its been said but you should really look into one of these kits

    [​IMG]
     
  19. w_o_t_boy
    Offline

    w_o_t_boy Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    223
    Project RWD had a lot of unneeded weight removed from the front end on Saturday night.
     
  20. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Yessir, the one on the right, with the frontend of the one on the left. That's what it is going to look like.

    And yeah, we yanked the motor last weekend, and I might try to remove the tranny while I wait for Mike Wray to get back from wherever he is. And anything else that gets in my way, well, I'll remove that too.
     
  21. Paul Revere
    Offline

    Paul Revere BANNED

    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When is the next session, I'd be down to swing over after work tomorrow or Wednesday.
     
  22. readymix
    Offline

    readymix ...Lest ye be trod upon... Staff Member

    Likes Received:
    2,892
    Trophy Points:
    473
    Probably not for a while. I have work all week, and then Thursday I'm in Chicago for a meeting. And Friday I'll likely be recovering from all the driving, so I don't think I'll be in the mood to tear anything down. Not sure really what is needed right now though. I might go pick up some cinder blocks and prop the wagon up so the gas tank, wheels, brakes and suspension can be yanked out of there. There's lots to do, but I don't want to get too far ahead of myself just yet.